1895 can't be right because I was 33 that year and she had been gone a long time by then. She was 81 when she died and I think I was 19 so that would have been 1962 so 1881 is probably right. If no one can come up with the right year, will have to check out her stone next time you are near Lyons. Sue
4 comments:
1895 can't be right because I was 33 that year and she had been gone a long time by then. She was 81 when she died and I think I was 19 so that would have been 1962 so 1881 is probably right. If no one can come up with the right year, will have to check out her stone next time you are near Lyons.
Sue
You were 33 in 1895? You're older than I thought...
:)
Correction I would have been 33 when she died at 81. Janell, you are so picky.
Sue
It's those darn dangling participles that get us in trouble every time.
Post a Comment